Name the owner of the decision to accept or challenge
The business must identify the person it has actually authorized to decide this case and record that authority alongside the provider’s deadline. The person gathering evidence, the person with account access and the person approving acceptance or challenge may have different responsibilities. A consultation request does not transfer the decision. For a Stripe formal dispute, accepting means the business will not contest the amount; challenging requires a response within the case’s response window, and the issuer decides the outcome.
For: A research-only merchant coordinating a formal payment dispute between the business owner, support staff and an outside adviser.
Open the provider’s current case record and confirm that it is a formal dispute. Record its status, stated reason, amount and actual response deadline, including the time reference shown. Do not set the deadline from the date an employee forwarded the notification or from a general description of how long disputes usually allow.
Stripe distinguishes accepting a formal dispute from challenging it. Acceptance affirms that the business is not contesting the disputed amount. A challenge presents the business’s evidence for the issuer to consider. These are consequential choices for this case, not interchangeable ways to acknowledge a notification.
An inquiry is a different event. Stripe states that accepting an inquiry does not resolve it. If the account calls the event an inquiry, keep its instructions separate instead of applying the formal-dispute decision record to it.
Separate decision authority from access and preparation
Look for the business’s existing assignment of responsibility: who may decide whether to contest this amount, who prepares the response and who may submit it through the provider account. A person who can collect order notes is not automatically authorized to accept the dispute. A person with a working submit control still needs the business’s instruction for this case.
Create a short internal authorization record that identifies the case, the decision-maker, the scope of their authority and the approval date. Keep any limits explicit. Authority to discuss an account with a provider does not, by itself, document authority to choose this dispute response.
If no decision-maker has been assigned, route that specific gap to the person empowered by the business to assign one. Do this against the actual deadline. Record a backup or escalation owner where the business has authorized one; do not treat silence, an unanswered message or the absence of the usual owner as permission to choose a response.
Give the owner the facts that change the choice
The decision record should connect the stated dispute reason to the genuine order, fulfillment, refund and communication records relevant to it. Identify what supports the business’s position, what contradicts it and what remains missing. A shipment record does not answer every possible dispute reason, and a support summary should not conceal a message that conflicts with it.
Ask the owner to record the chosen response and the factual basis for it. If the business chooses acceptance, preserve that affirmative instruction. If it chooses a challenge, identify the evidence set the owner approved and the person responsible for submitting it. The worksheet below helps establish whether those records exist; the actual private records stay in the business’s controlled case file.
An uncertain fact should be described as uncertain. An adviser’s view can inform the decision, but neither that view nor this worksheet predicts the issuer’s ruling. The business chooses its response; Stripe’s documentation says the issuer decides whether the dispute is won or lost.
Close the gap between approval and submission
Stripe’s response documentation says the response window is limited, missing it loses the dispute, and the evidence response is submitted once and cannot be edited afterward. Approval therefore needs to identify the response actually ready to submit, rather than an earlier draft with unresolved attachments. Record who will perform the final action before the provider’s deadline.
After an authorized action, preserve the provider’s confirmation or current status with the internal decision record. An internal note saying approved is not evidence that the provider received the response. If the approval and the provider record differ, the assigned case owner must resolve that discrepancy through the provider’s available process.
A Prism checkout-review inquiry can describe an operational handoff that needs discussion. Scope, responsibilities, fees and terms are agreed before work; an inquiry alone does not appoint Prism as the decision-maker, submitter or deadline owner. Keep the existing case ownership active while consultation scope remains unconfirmed.
Dispute decision authority
Complete this for one actual case. Use an anonymized local case label, role names and record-availability findings here. Keep exact provider references, evidence and staff authorization details in your internal case file. A complete authority record requires both an authorized decision and a confirmed submission owner; one does not establish the other.
Worksheet entries are not submitted by Prism’s worksheet and are not saved by the site. Use record types, availability, anonymized observations, or match/mismatch results. Do not enter government identifiers, customer names or addresses, customer messages, receipt-access links, card or bank details, passwords, or keys. Send sensitive documents only through the provider’s verified secure channel.
Dispute decision authority. The last column is for temporary notes.
Decision record
What to establish privately
What a gap means
Your finding
Case reference and event type
What to establish privatelyMatch the notice to the current provider case and confirm formal dispute versus inquiry.
What a gap meansAn unclassified notice does not establish that accept-or-challenge is the appropriate workflow.
Actual deadline
What to establish privatelyPreserve the provider’s displayed date, time and time reference in the internal case file.
What a gap meansA forwarded-email date or assumed response window does not supply the case deadline.
Authorized decision-maker
What to establish privatelyIdentify the role and existing authorization to choose this case’s response, including any limit.
What a gap meansEvidence preparation or account access alone does not document decision authority.
Relevant facts
What to establish privatelyIndex the records addressing the stated reason, including contradictions and missing evidence.
What a gap meansA favorable summary without its supporting records is not a complete basis for the choice.
Chosen response record
What to establish privatelyRetain the owner’s dated acceptance or challenge instruction and the reasons recorded for it.
What a gap meansSilence or a request for advice is not an affirmative response decision.
Submission responsibility
What to establish privatelyConfirm who is authorized to act and which evidence version was approved for a challenge.
What a gap meansAn approved draft can remain unsubmitted; assign the final action explicitly.
Provider acknowledgment
What to establish privatelyCompare the recorded action with the provider’s confirmation or current case state.
What a gap meansInternal approval alone does not show the provider received the response.
Escalation authority
What to establish privatelyIdentify the business-authorized backup or escalation path if the decision owner is unavailable.
What a gap meansAn unresolved owner requires escalation while the actual deadline still governs.
These are temporary notes. Leaving or reloading this page may clear them. Worksheet entries are not sent automatically. If you copy notes into the consultation message and submit the form, Prism receives them as part of your request.
Limits
Stripe’s formal-dispute response rules apply to Stripe’s documented process. Another provider or payment method needs its own case instructions.
This worksheet records authority and available facts; it does not choose acceptance or challenge, provide a legal opinion or predict the issuer’s outcome.
Keep customer messages, order exports, card data, credentials and private case evidence out of the public consultation form.
Stripe respond to disputes — checked 2026-09-21. Formal disputes can be accepted or challenged; evidence submission is once-only and cannot be edited, the response window is limited, and the issuer decides. Accepting an inquiry does not resolve it. The documentation cannot identify the merchant’s authorized decision-maker.
Prism solutions — checked 2026-09-21. Consultation scope, fees and terms are discussed before work. A consultation request alone does not authorize a payment action or promise an account outcome.
Get help with store operations
Need help with the order, email or fulfillment step itself?