Review your FAQ for claims that conflict with the storefront
They contradict it when an answer states a fact the product page, policy, or records show to be different — not merely when the wording differs. Classify each answer: audience, intended purpose, product attributes, order and policy terms, or business facts. Then compare it with the page or record that would support it. A scientific product attribute stated accurately is a different question from a human-outcome marketing claim; keep them separate. Correct the answers that are factually wrong or unsupported, and route legal questions to counsel.
For: A research-only merchant with a public FAQ that answers questions about products, purpose, orders, policies, or the business.
An FAQ feels like customer service, but structurally it is a claims page. Each answer states something about the business: who buys, what the products are for, how orders are handled, what happens when something goes wrong. A buyer can read an answer as a promise, and anyone reviewing the site can hold it to the same standard as the pages it describes.
The FTC's truth-in-advertising guidance says advertising must be truthful and not misleading, with appropriate substantiation, across media including the web. That principle does not exclude an FAQ. An answer that reassures beyond what the product page, the policy, or the business's records support is a claim without evidence, wherever it sits on the site.
Classify each answer
Five classes cover most FAQ answers. An audience claim says who the products are for. An intended-purpose claim says what they are for. A product-attribute claim states a fact about the product itself, such as a specification or composition. An order-and-policy claim states the terms buyers get: shipping, returns, refunds, privacy. A business-fact claim describes the company: its name, history, or operations.
The class decides the comparison. Audience and intended-purpose answers must match how the catalog actually frames the products. Check a product-attribute answer against the listing and the records supporting it. A factual specification and a human-outcome marketing claim require different assessment; factual accuracy alone does not resolve every legal question. Keep human-outcome marketing claims out of a research-only merchant's FAQ. Order-and-policy answers must match the policy pages in effect, though not necessarily word for word. Business-fact answers need a record that shows the fact.
Compare for factual consistency, not identical wording
Open the page or record each answer depends on and compare the facts. A conflict is a factual contradiction: the FAQ promises dispatch sooner than the published shipping policy allows, or the FAQ says products are for laboratory research while a linked product page describes personal use. Different wording that states the same fact is not a conflict, and a fact the business can support from records does not become false because one page omits it.
Stripe's website article says the business name and descriptions on the site must align with what the business told Stripe. That is Stripe's rule for Stripe accounts, and a reminder of the general point: anyone reviewing the business can hold the FAQ and the product page side by side the same way you just did. Record a contradiction with both URLs and both wordings. Do not resolve one by editing whichever page you opened last; decide which statement is true and fix the other.
Name who can edit, and what stays open
An FAQ conflict is not fixed until the corrected answer is public. Record who can edit the FAQ, whether it lives in a page builder, a plugin, or a theme, and the date the new wording went live. An intended edit is not a correction anyone can read.
Some answers should not be repaired by editing alone. A question about human use, dosing, or outcomes is not a copy problem for a research-only merchant; it is a sign the FAQ is attracting or inviting the wrong claim entirely, and the safer fix is removal. Questions about legality belong to qualified counsel, not to a website edit. What a consistent FAQ still cannot do is establish eligibility or legal status. Prism's published review covers marketing claims and linked content within an agreed scope; the provider decides the account, and counsel answers the legal question.
FAQ answer and evidence comparison
One row per FAQ question. Copy the answer's exact wording and open the supporting page or record before judging. A conflict means a factual contradiction, not different wording for the same fact.
Worksheet entries are not submitted by Prism’s worksheet and are not saved by the site. Use record types, availability, anonymized observations, or match/mismatch results. Do not enter government identifiers, customer names or addresses, customer messages, receipt-access links, card or bank details, passwords, or keys. Send sensitive documents only through the provider’s verified secure channel.
FAQ answer and evidence comparison. The last column is for temporary notes.
FAQ question
Claim class and exact answer wording
Page or record that would support it
Your note
Who the products are for
Claim class and exact answer wordingAudience. Quote the answer's audience sentence.
Page or record that would support itThe product and category pages. A factual mismatch between the FAQ's audience and the catalog's framing is a conflict to record.
What the products are for
Claim class and exact answer wordingIntended purpose. Quote the answer's purpose sentence.
Page or record that would support itThe product page's stated purpose. A purpose the store does not sell, especially any human use, is not repairable by wording.
Product attributes
Claim class and exact answer wordingProduct attribute. Quote any specification, composition, or property sentence.
Page or record that would support itThe listing and the record behind the attribute. Verify the specification against that record; an unsupported attribute is an evidence gap. This comparison does not establish legal clearance.
Order and policy terms
Claim class and exact answer wordingOrder/policy. Quote the promised term: shipping, returns, refunds, privacy.
Page or record that would support itThe matching policy page, compared for the same effect. A friendlier FAQ than policy is a factual conflict.
The business itself
Claim class and exact answer wordingBusiness fact. Quote any sentence about the company's name, history, or operations.
Page or record that would support itThe record that shows the fact. If no record shows it, mark it unverified rather than repeating it.
Who can edit and when it changed
Claim class and exact answer wordingThe person and system that controls the FAQ text.
Page or record that would support itThe date the corrected answer was public. A draft in email is not a fix anyone can read.
These are temporary notes. Leaving or reloading this page may clear them. Worksheet entries are not sent automatically. If you copy notes into the consultation message and submit the form, Prism receives them as part of your request.
Limits
Do not use the FAQ to add an audience, purpose, or outcome the product pages do not claim, and do not treat different wording for the same fact as a conflict.
FTC guidance requires truthful, substantiated claims; this page does not decide whether any particular claim violates the law.
A consistent FAQ does not establish legality, eligibility, or continued processing. Legal questions go to qualified counsel; account questions go to the provider.
FTC truth in advertising — checked 2026-09-28. Advertising must be truthful and not misleading, with appropriate substantiation, across media including the web. The principle applies to claims wherever they appear, including help-style answers; it is not evidence that a specific phrase is lawful.
Stripe business website for account activation — checked 2026-09-21. Stripe requires the business name and descriptions on the website to align with what the business told Stripe, and reviews the site to understand what is sold.
Prism features — checked 2026-09-28. A review can cover marketing claims and linked content, including statements that conflict with a product description, within an agreed scope. Findings are informational and do not guarantee approval or continued processing.
Prism contact — checked 2026-09-21. The form collects the website, products, and question. The request does not book an appointment, purchase a service, or submit a processing application; scope, fees, and terms are discussed before work.