When your blog tells a different story from your product pages

Merchant-owned content is the business talking

Content the merchant publishes is the merchant's own statement, whether it carries the store's header or is presented as a stand-alone publication. A separate brand or blog section can be a genuinely separate editorial product; that does not make its product claims someone else's responsibility. If the business chose to publish it, the business owns what it says.

This matters most at observable product references: an article that names a product, a compound, or a category the store sells, or that links to one. An article with no product reference at all is a different editorial judgment, outside this map. But do not treat the absence of a hyperlink as an exemption — a claim about a product the store sells is a claim about that product whether or not the word is blue.

Find the articles that reference the catalog

Start with the articles that observably reference the catalog: posts that name or link a product, category, or compound the store sells, plus buying guides, comparison posts, and announcements about the catalog. Promotional content the merchant published is the core of the map.

For each article, record the products it references and the exact statements it makes about audience, use, and benefit. Copy wording; do not summarize from memory. An article written two years ago by a contractor is still the store's article.

Compare the article's story with the listing's facts

Open the product page for each referenced product and compare the facts. The conflicts that matter are factual: the article claims a benefit the listing does not mention and no record supports, addresses an audience the catalog does not address, or describes a use the store does not sell. On a research-only storefront, the sharpest version is an article that slides toward personal or human use while the catalog holds the research framing.

The FTC's truth-in-advertising guidance requires truthful, substantiated claims across media including the web. Stripe's prohibited-use rules reject misleading information about the nature of the business and processing for undisclosed products — Stripe's rules for Stripe, and a reminder that a provider can read the blog and the catalog as one business. Record each factual conflict with both URLs and both wordings, and mark an evidence gap as a gap rather than a proven falsehood. An unsupported benefit is not cured by the article's educational tone, and it is not cured by removing the link either.

Owned, guest, and syndicated content are different fixes

Check who wrote the article and where else it appears. Content the store wrote is fully within its control. Guest or contributed content is the store's choice to publish. Syndicated or supplier-provided articles carry someone else's claims under the store's name, and 'the supplier wrote it' does not remove the store's responsibility for what it publishes.

For each kind, record who can change it and how. A guest article may need a correction request. A supplier article may need replacement. An old article whose claims no longer match the catalog may deserve correction or retirement, and the change should be recorded like any other catalog change. What none of these fixes involves is cosmetic concealment: trimming a link, softening a screenshot, or moving the article somewhere less visible while the claim stays published.

Fix forward, and keep the map alive

The honest actions are: correct the claim, add the missing context or evidence, or retire the article. Record the owner and the date each change was public. Then keep the map current: new articles should land on it before publication, because the blog is where next quarter's conflict is drafted.

What this never settles is legality or eligibility. A consistent blog is not a legal finding, and no article should be edited to imply one. Legal questions belong to qualified counsel; account decisions belong to the provider. Prism's published review covers marketing claims and linked content within an agreed scope, with findings that are informational.

Article-to-product claim map

One row per article that observably references the catalog. Copy the exact claim, open the product concerned, and record who controls a change.

Worksheet entries are not submitted by Prism’s worksheet and are not saved by the site. Use record types, availability, anonymized observations, or match/mismatch results. Do not enter government identifiers, customer names or addresses, customer messages, receipt-access links, card or bank details, passwords, or keys. Send sensitive documents only through the provider’s verified secure channel.

These are temporary notes. Leaving or reloading this page may clear them. Worksheet entries are not sent automatically. If you copy notes into the consultation message and submit the form, Prism receives them as part of your request.