Website representations

A countdown needs a real promotion deadline

The offer condition named beside the timer should change at the genuine deadline. Identify exactly what ends, when it ends and which event qualifies an order before that time. Compare the merchant’s promotion record, the timer configuration and the live offer after expiry. If the same offer remains available while the timer repeatedly presents a new last chance, the countdown does not substantiate the claimed deadline. Remove or correct the urgency claim until you can tie it to an actual offer period.

For: A research-only merchant using a countdown to advertise a time-limited offer.

Updated 2026-10-01

Define the event the timer promises

A countdown is a claim about time remaining to obtain something. Before checking its animation, write what the buyer would lose when it ends: the stated reduction, an included item or another condition actually offered by the business. Use the promotion wording and the approved offer record. If the owner cannot name a change, there is no documented end event for the display to count toward.

Record which action must happen before the cutoff. An order placed, a payment completed and a cart opened are different events. Your offer record needs to say which one governs, and the public wording should explain the relevant limit. Do not infer that a cart started before zero keeps the offer afterward. That treatment must come from the real terms and implementation.

Compare one deadline across the offer and the timer

Use the actual calendar date, time and timezone from the promotion record. Compare them with the timer’s configured target and the condition that stops the offer. A display and an offer rule can point at different times even when both are called the campaign end. Preserve the original timezone when recording each value so the owner can resolve any difference.

Read any restart or visitor-specific setting in the tool actually installed. A shared campaign deadline should still name the same endpoint when someone returns. If the offer genuinely has an individual eligibility period, record what starts that period and what ends the buyer’s eligibility. Do not describe an individual period as a storewide closing time. A configuration screen establishes what was set; it does not prove what every visitor saw.

Keep evidence of the transition through zero

Preserve dated observations from the actual promotion before and after its endpoint. Capture the public wording, the displayed time, the offer terms and the price or benefit then available. Inspect returning visits and the placements used by the campaign without submitting a purchase. Where the effect can only be established from completed activity, use authorized internal records of genuine orders and leave unobserved behavior unresolved.

The important comparison is between the promised change and the recorded outcome. A timer disappearing while the same deadline claim remains elsewhere is incomplete evidence. A restarted clock is also not evidence that a new offer was approved. If a genuine extension was decided, preserve the original end time, the extension decision and the revised public terms. Rewriting the old record would hide what the original urgency statement said.

The FTC’s truth-in-advertising guidance supplies the general expectation that website advertising be accurate, supported and nonmisleading. It does not approve a timer design or specify that this worksheet establishes legality. Treat the comparison as evidence about your claim; refer questions about the particular promotion and applicable law to qualified advice.

Resolve the mismatch and assign the end-of-offer work

When the record supports a genuine endpoint but the display differs, align the wording and configuration with that endpoint and record the correction. When the business intends to keep the offer continuously available, remove wording that says access is about to end. When the actual offer period remains unknown, stop publishing the unsupported deadline while its owner resolves it.

Name who owns the offer decision and who can update the display and offer rule. The owner should also specify what happens to open carts and affected customer questions under the real terms. These are responsibilities to record, not assumptions about capabilities of a timer plugin.

For a scoped Prism website-review consultation, provide the public promotion URL, the research-only products involved and the precise mismatch between the deadline and the observed offer. Scope, fees and terms are agreed before work. The contact request receives email follow-up; it does not book an appointment, purchase a service or submit a processing application.

Promotion deadline record

Complete a separate sheet for each actual offer period. Put source locations and dated observations in the final column. A configured deadline with no observed expiry remains unverified; a conflict between the promise and outcome needs correction before the same urgency claim is reused.

Worksheet entries are not submitted by Prism’s worksheet and are not saved by the site. Use record types, availability, anonymized observations, or match/mismatch results. Do not enter government identifiers, customer names or addresses, customer messages, receipt-access links, card or bank details, passwords, or keys. Send sensitive documents only through the provider’s verified secure channel.

Promotion deadline record. The last column is for temporary notes.
Deadline factEvidence to collectHow to interpret itYour record
OfferExact public wording, affected products and the merchant’s approved promotion record.Name the condition that ends; a timer alone does not define the offer.
Actual end timeThe calendar date and clock time in the offer decision, timer setting and offer rule.Resolve differences instead of selecting whichever endpoint is latest.
TimezoneThe timezone stated publicly and the timezone used by each relevant setting.Keep the time references explicit before comparing the endpoints.
Qualifying eventThe real terms identifying when an order becomes eligible and how open carts are treated.A cart visit and a completed payment are not interchangeable cutoff events.
Post-deadline behaviorDated observations of the message and available offer after expiry, including returning visits.Record whether the named benefit ended; a new clock does not establish a new offer.
Responsible ownerThe person who decides the offer period and the person who can change the published behavior.Assign unresolved differences and preserve any extension decision separately.

These are temporary notes. Leaving or reloading this page may clear them. Worksheet entries are not sent automatically. If you copy notes into the consultation message and submit the form, Prism receives them as part of your request.

Limits

  • This worksheet evaluates the evidence behind a deadline. It does not determine the legal validity of an offer or certify compliance.
  • Use genuine promotion records and observations. Do not create transactions merely to fill the worksheet.
  • Keep payment details, passwords and customer records out of the worksheet and public consultation form. Provider eligibility remains the provider’s decision.

Sources

  • FTC truth in advertising — checked 2026-09-28. Website promotion claims must be truthful, nonmisleading and substantiated. The general guidance does not establish that a particular timer or phrase is lawful.
  • Prism solutions — checked 2026-09-21. Prism offers storefront review and help with provider website questions within an agreed scope. Scope, fees and terms are discussed before work; the provider decides eligibility.
  • Prism contact — checked 2026-09-21. The inquiry asks for the website, products and question, excludes card details, passwords and customer records, and receives email follow-up. It is not an appointment, purchase or processing application.

Request a website review

Want a second look at your own storefront pages?