Processing choices

Moving from marketplace sales to your own store

No. Marketplace history can document real trading activity, but it does not by itself authorize a new direct payment account. Preserve who sold, which arrangement handled payments and whose records describe that activity. Then identify the proposed direct seller, website and complete catalog for a separate provider decision. Stripe explicitly says a new account does not inherit special status from an existing account; that statement applies to Stripe and does not describe every marketplace arrangement.

For: A research-only merchant adding a direct storefront after selling through a marketplace.

Updated 2026-10-01

Keep history attached to the arrangement that produced it

Begin with the marketplace seller agreement and the reports you can actually retrieve. Identify the seller entity, the marketplace account holder and the party named on payment or payout records. Do not assume that the marketplace brand tells you who held the processing relationship. If the agreement does not resolve that role, record the uncertainty alongside the history.

For every report used in the inquiry, retain its issuer, period, sales channel and named owner. Marketplace orders may document genuine sales without being statements for a direct merchant account held by your business. Label them by what they are. A provider can decide whether those records answer its history request; renaming a report cannot make it evidence of a different account.

Compare what will change on the direct channel

Place the proposed direct arrangement beside the historical one. Compare the legal seller, public business name, domain, product range, ordering process and fulfillment responsibility. Mark each as unchanged, changed or not yet established, and name the record behind that conclusion. The same product listing does not establish that the seller arrangement or payment account will be the same.

If the marketplace will remain open, describe the direct store as an additional channel. If marketplace sales will stop, describe that separately. This comparison addresses the new account scope; it does not require closing the marketplace account or transferring its payment records. Keep planned direct activity distinct from completed marketplace sales.

Give the provider a website it can compare with the inquiry

Stripe says it checks business identification, whether it can support what the business sells and business risk. Its website guidance requires the public business name and product descriptions to align with the application. It also says the site must be accessible without a password and that an incomplete catalog can prevent activation. A marketplace listing alone does not establish what a separate direct website now offers.

For a Stripe inquiry, compare the actual direct site with the information submitted to Stripe. For another provider, use that provider’s request and written terms. Identify the full research-only catalog, including differences from the marketplace listing, rather than presenting only the products previously sold. These sources do not classify every research-only business as accepted or rejected.

Record the decision for the new scope

Ask whether the prospective account covers the named legal entity, direct domain, catalog and sales channel. Keep the response with its date and any conditions. A request for more documents is an open step. A response that names only the marketplace arrangement leaves the direct channel unresolved. Even if the entity is unchanged, Stripe’s multiple-account guidance says a new account does not inherit special status.

You can complete the comparison and correct contradictions before submitting an inquiry. The provider decides eligibility and account terms. For a scoped Prism processing consultation, send the direct website, the research-only product types and the specific gap between the old and proposed arrangements. Prism can discuss processing preparation and the storefront; scope, fees and responsibilities are agreed before work. The contact request receives email follow-up and is not an appointment, purchase or processing application.

Marketplace-to-direct scope comparison

Complete the last column from your own records. Use unchanged, changed or unresolved and a document reference for each comparison. An unresolved direct-account scope remains a provider question; historical sales alone do not close it. Keep originals privately and omit customer-level records.

Worksheet entries are not submitted by Prism’s worksheet and are not saved by the site. Use record types, availability, anonymized observations, or match/mismatch results. Do not enter government identifiers, customer names or addresses, customer messages, receipt-access links, card or bank details, passwords, or keys. Send sensitive documents only through the provider’s verified secure channel.

Marketplace-to-direct scope comparison. The last column is for temporary notes.
Scope itemHistorical evidence to retainDirect-channel comparisonYour finding and next action
Marketplace seller arrangementSeller agreement and the party named on marketplace payment reports.Identify which historical permissions concern that arrangement and whether any writing expressly covers the new direct channel.
Direct seller entityLegal seller name attached to past sales, without tax numbers or identity documents.Compare with the entity applying for the direct account; explain a difference rather than relabeling the history.
Historical record ownerReport issuer, account holder, period and type of report.State what the record establishes and ask whether the new provider accepts that evidence for its history request.
New website scopeCatalog and channel represented by the historical marketplace records.Compare the direct domain, public name, full product list and fulfillment description with the new inquiry.
New provider decisionExisting decision, retaining its named entity, account and channel.Record the new provider’s dated response, covered scope and remaining conditions. A prior marketplace decision is not a substitute.

These are temporary notes. Leaving or reloading this page may clear them. Worksheet entries are not sent automatically. If you copy notes into the consultation message and submit the form, Prism receives them as part of your request.

Limits

  • Marketplace contracts differ; this worksheet cannot identify the account holder or legal seller without your actual records.
  • Stripe’s rules apply to Stripe. Trading history, a functioning checkout and a research-only description do not establish another provider’s approval.
  • Keep card data, authentication codes, payment-link tokens, passwords, bank details, identity documents and customer records out of the worksheet and public consultation form.

Sources

  • Stripe multiple accounts — checked 2026-09-21. A new Stripe account does not inherit special status from an existing account. Each account is associated with one legal entity.
  • Stripe business information requirements — checked 2026-09-21. Stripe verifies business identification, whether it can support what the business sells and business risk; unresolved checks can require further information.
  • Stripe business website for account activation — checked 2026-09-21. Business names and product descriptions must align with the application. The website must be accessible without a password; an incomplete catalog may prevent activation.
  • Prism solutions — checked 2026-09-21. Prism offers storefront review, processing preparation and help with provider website questions. Scope, fees and terms are discussed before work; the provider decides eligibility and account terms.
  • Prism contact — checked 2026-09-21. The form takes the website, products and question, excludes card details, passwords and customer records and receives email follow-up. It is not an appointment, purchase or processing application.

Discuss my processing options

Want to talk through your own processing situation?